State BANK Of India & Ors. v. Neelam NAG & Anr. (2016) — Supreme Court judgment

Headnote

The reporters’ summary of the points decided. It is not part of the judgment.

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

v. NEELAM NAG & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 4715of2011)

NOVEMBER 09, 2016

[T.S. THAKUR, CJI AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.]

Judgment/Order - Modification/correction - To be treated as . part of the judgment reported in [2016] 5 SCR 278- Word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title to be read as "Neelam Nag & Am: - Word "respondent" in the judgment to be read as "respondent No. l ".

Judgment

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4715 of201 l. From the Judgment and Order dated 28.06.2010 of the High Court D of Judicature at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh in WA 80 of2010. K. V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv, Sanjay Kapur, Anmol Chandan, Ms. Priyanka Das, Ms. Shubhra Kapur, Advs. for the Appellants.

Atul Jha, Sandeep Jha, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, R. B. Sharma, Akshat Shrivastava, Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Advs. for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER The following modification/correction shall be treated as part of the judgment dated 16.09.2016 in the aforementioned appeal:-

(i)

The word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title shall be read as " Neelam Nag & Anr."

(ii)

The word "respondent" whereever referred in the judgment shall be read as "respondent No. I".

G ~ Modification in earlier judgment

Nidhi Jain

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.