Supreme Court of India · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 870

C.b.i. BANK Securities & Fraud CELL v. Ramesh Gelli & Ors.

Decided
2 May 2016
Neutral citation
2016 INSC 1180
Bench
RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Cites 1

C.B.I. BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL v. RAMESH GELLI & ORS. (Crl. MP Nos. 6416-6420 of 2016)

In (CriminalAppealNo.1077-1081 of2013) MAY02,2016

[RANJAN GOGOi AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.]

c

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - s.13(2) rlw. s.13(l){d) - Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - s.46A - Separate Judgments of Hon 'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, and Hon 'hie Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant reported in [2016] 1 SCR 762 - Para 25 of the Judgment of Hon 'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant Modification made in the said para. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Cr! MP Nos. 64166420 of2016 in Criminal Appeal Nos. I 077-1081 of2013.

From the Judgment and Order dated 13.07.2009 of the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No. 131 of 2007 with Criminal Writ Petition No. 2400 of2008 to 2403 of2008. Tushar Mehta, ASG, Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Ms. Ranjana Narayan, T. A. Khan, M.A. Meroria, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv., G. Umapathy, Rakesh K. Sharma, S. Ramasubramanian, Ranjit B. Raut, Ms. Bina Gupta, Abay A. Jena, Mis Khaitan & Co., Ad vs. for the Respondents.

The Order of the Court was delivered

ORDER Jn paragraph 25 of the Judgment dated 23.02.2016 (by Mr. Prafulla

C.B.I. BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL v. RAMESH GELLI 871 & ORS. C. Pant, J.) instead of words "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" the words "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949" shall be substituted and in th~ last sentence of the paragraph instead of "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988", the words "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988", shall be substituted. CRL.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of2016 are accordingly allowed. Nidhi Jain

Petitions allowed.

Cites · 1

Earlier Supreme Court judgments in our index that this one cites by name.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.