Supreme Court of India · [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 784

State Of Kerala v. M.m. Abdul Khader

Decided
15 December 1995
Neutral citation
1995 INSC 909
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Cited by 2 later Supreme Court judgments

Headnote

The reporters’ summary of the points decided. It is not part of the judgment.

STATE OF KERALA v. M.M. ABDUL KHADER DECEMBER 15, 1995

[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

S. 23(1-Aj-Award of Collector being dated 21.4.1980-Claimants nor entitled ro benefits under the section.

The State Government filed appeal against the jndgment of the High Court allowing the claimants, the benefits of s. 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Allowing the appeal, this Court HELD : Since the award of the Collector is of April, 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under s. 23 (l·A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. [785-C]

Judgment

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 12120 of 1995. From the Judgment and Order dated 28.1.93 of the Kerala High Court in L.A.A. No. 244 of 1988.

M.T. George for the Appellants. N. Sudahakaran for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered :

Leave granted. The only controversy is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of June 4, 1979, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act.

STATEv. M.M.ABDULKHADER

The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The Order of the High Court is set aside. No costs.

CA. No. 12121 of 1995 Leave granted. The only controversy with which we are concerned in this appeal is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Ac~ 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act. The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The order of the High Court is set aside. No costs. R.P.

Appeals allowed.

c

Cited by · 2

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.