Supreme Court of India · [1995] 1 S.C.R. 250

Union Of India v. B.v. Saroja And Anr.

Decided
13 January 1995
Neutral citation
1995 INSC 37
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY, A.S. ANAND
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Cited by 1 later Supreme Court judgment

(

~

UNION OF INDIA v. B.V. SAROJA AND ANR.

)/.,

......

JANUARY 13, 1995 ~

[K. RAMASWAMY AND DR. A.S. ANAND, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Amendment Act 68184-Section 23(1-A) -No entitlement to payment of additional amount.

C.

Practice and Procedure-Review allowed in view of the Constitution Bench judgment. After publication of the award in 1976, upon notification u/s. 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act the respondents sought payment of additional amount upder Section 23(1-A) of the Amendment Act 68/84.

Allowing the appeal, this Court

-< -

HELD : The respondents are not entitled to the payment of the additional amount as contemplated under Section 23(1-A) of Land Ac· quisition Act as amended by Amendment Act 68/84 in view of the Constitu· tion Bench judgment. [251 ·C)

KS. Paripooran v. State of Kerala, [1994) 5 SCC 593, applied. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition No. 41 of y

1993.

•

IN

Civil Appeal No. 887 of 1995.

From the Judgment and Order dated 15.9.89 of the Karnataka High Court in M.F.A. No. 2814 of 1985. AS. Nambiar, Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Ms. Sushma Suri and Ms. Anil Katiyar for the Petitioner/Appellant.

P. Mahale for the Respondents.

~

U.0.1. v. B.V. SAROJA

The following Order of the Court was delivered :

The notification under Sectioin 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on March 30, 1972. The award was made by the Land Acquisition Collector on September 15, 1976 and the possession was taken on October 15, 1976. The point raised now is covered by the judgment of the Constitution Bench in KS. Palipooman v. State of Kera/a, reported in (1994] 5 SCC 593. In view of these facts, the respondents are not entitled to the payment of the additional amount as contemplated under section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act as amended by Amendment Act 68/84. As a consequence, the claimants are not entitled to the above benefit. The Review Petition is ordered. Leave granted in S.L.P. The appeal is allowed only to the above extent. The award of the Courts below are accordingly modified. No costs. A.G.

Appeal allowed.

c

Cited by · 1

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.