M/s. RAAG RANG And Anr. v. The General Manager, Delhi Telephones And Ors. (1997) — Supreme Court judgment

Headnote

The reporters’ summary of the points decided. It is not part of the judgment.

M/S. RAAG RANG AND ANR.

v. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DELHI TELEPHONES AND ORS. APRIL 3, 1997

[K. RAMASWAMY AND D.P: WADHWA, JJ.] Telegraph Act, 1885: Section 11-A. Telephone--Payme11t due against-Disputed question offact whether payment has been made or not-Held cowt cannot satisfactorily decide the dispute--Altemative arbitration under section 11-A of the Telegraphs Act is available for adjudication of the dispute-It is open to the appellants either to make payment of the bill or submit an application to the competent auth01ity to ·adjudicate the dispute and on such application being made appropriate decision would be taken.

Judgment

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3660 of 1986. From the Judgment and Order dated 14.4.86 of the Delhi High Court in C.W.P. No. 750of1986.

Mukul Mudgal for the Appellants. Ms. Bharati Anand (NP) for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered :

The appellants claim that they have paid a sum of Rs. 5,370.35 together with reconnection charges of Rs. 50, nonetheless, there is a thn;at of disconnection to the appellant. In the letter, Annexure-E at page 36 of the paper book, it is stated as under : "Please refer to this letter of even No. dated 8.11.85 regarding payment of telephone dues pertaining to telephone No. 386056.

You may please recall your visit to Sh. K.K. Trikha Area Manager (Central) on 28.8.85 in connection with payment of the dues against telephone No. 386056. During the discussion you have H intimated that the payment of the said bills were made in the 1st week of May, 79. Investigations have been made by GMT office and records have been thoroughly checked. Payment of bills in question detailed below do not appear in the bonds of GMT office.

You are therefore again requested to arrange payment of the following bills and furnish payment particulars within 10 days from the date of issue of this letter;"

In view of this letter, the primary disputed question is of fact, viz., whether or not payment has been made. Under these circumstances, we cannot satisfactorily decide the dispute. Alternative arbitration under Section 11-A of the Telegraphs Act is available for adjudication of the dispute. It is open to the appellants either to make payment of the bill or submit an application to the competent authority to adjudicate the dispute and on such application being mode appropriate decision would be taken. Until then, the interim stay granted by this Court would continue. The appellants shall make payment of an application, as the case may be, within 30 days from today, subject to such objections that may be raised. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. T.N.A.

Appeal disposed of.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.