Supreme Court of India · [2000] 1 S.C.R. 26

M/s. Weston Components Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, NEW Delhi

Decided
4 January 2000
Neutral citation
2000 INSC 3
Bench
B.N. KIRPAL, S. RAJENDRA BABU
Outcome
Dismissed

M/S. WESTON COMPONENTS LTD.

v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI JANUARY 4, 2000

(B.N. KIRPAL AND S. RAJENDRA BABU, JJ.j

Customs Act, 1962 : Customs-Redemption fine---Goods in custody of custom C authority-Goods released to party on execution of bond-Subsequently it was found import was not valid-Held mere release of goods would not take awiry .. power of the authorities to levy redemption fine. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7144 of

1999. From the Judgment and Order dated 20.8.99 of the Central Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in A. No. C/44/98A in P.O. No. 1160 of 1999-A.

L.P. Asthana, C.N. Sreekumar and G. Prakash for the Appellant. The following Order of the Court was delivered :

It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that redemption fine could not be imposed because the goods were no loger in the custody of the respondent-authority. It is an admitted fact that the goods were released to the appellant Ou an application made by it and on the appellant executing a bond. Under these circumstance& if substquently it is found that the import was not valid or that there was any other irregularity which would entitle the customs authorities to confiscate the said goods, then the mere fact that the goods were released on the bond being executed would not take away the power of the customs authorities to levy redemption fine. The appeal is dismissed.

H T.N.A.

Appeal dismissed.

..

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.