Supreme Court of India · [2004] 1 S.C.R. 126

NEW India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Manjit KAUR And Ors.

Decided
5 January 2004
Neutral citation
2004 INSC 11
Bench
V.N. KHARE
Outcome
Dismissed
Cites 1

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

_..,

V.

MANJIT KAUR AND ORS. JANUARY 5, 2004

(V. N. KHARE, CJ. AND S.B. SINHA, J.]

c

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-Motor accident-Driver ofvehicle not holding licence-Compensation-Awarded by Tribunal and Co11/ir111ed by High Court with permission to Insurance C:ompany to realize the amount from the driver of the vehicle-On appeal, held: In view of the facts of the case orders of Courts below justified and need no inference under discretionary jurisdictionConstitution of India, 1950-Article 136.

.,

National Insurance Co. ltd v. Swaran Singh and Ors., 120041 3 SCC 297, relied on. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (C) No. 176 of 2004.

{

From the Judgment and· Order dated 12.12.2002 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in F.A.0. No. 5766 of 2002.

"~

I·

!!;

Dr. Kailash Chand (N.P.) for the Petitioner. The Judgment of the Cou1t was delivered by V. N. KHARE, CJ. This Special Leave Petition is directed against a judgment and order dated 12112/2002 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby and whereunder it affirmed the award passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ropar in Case No. 119 of 8.12.2000. The question raised in the Special Leave Petition is as to whether in view of the finding of the Learned Tribunal that the driver of the Maruti Car was not holding a driving licence and paiticularly when he happened to be the owner of the vehicle, the learned Tribunal as well as the High Court committed an error in passing the impugned judgment.

Keeping in view of the fact that both the Tribunal and the High Court had recorded that the Petitioner would be entitled to realise the amount of

.,. i

,A

,.

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. 1•. MANJIT KAUR [Y. N. KflARE, CJ.]

compensation as assessed from the driver of the offending vehicle, we do not A intend to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, particularly, having regard to our decision in SLP (Civil) No. 9027 of 2003, National Insurance Co. ltd. v. Swaran Singh and Ors. we do not intend to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction in the matter.

The Petition is dismissed. K.K.T.

Petition dismissed.

Cites · 1

Earlier Supreme Court judgments in our index that this one cites by name.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.