Supreme Court of India · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 268

Madhya Pradesh Rural ROAD Development Authority And Anr. v. Backbone Enterprises Limited And Anr.

Decided
18 April 2018
Bench
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, R.F. NARIMAN
Outcome
Disposed off
Cited by 1 later Supreme Court judgment

Headnote

The reporters’ summary of the points decided. It is not part of the judgment.

MADHYA PRADESH RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. v. BACKBONE ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND ANR.

(Civil Appeal No. 4011 of 2018) APRIL 18, 2018 [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983:

Arbitration proceedings – Jurisdiction of Arbitration Tribunal – Held: *Va Tech case on which the impugned order had relied on, had since been overruled, the impugned order is set aside – Matter is remanded to Arbitration Tribunal to decide the case on merit. *Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another (2011) 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled.

Case Law Reference (2011) 13 SCC 261

Stood overruled

Para 2

Judgment

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4011 of

2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 29.11.2010 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in W. P. No. 7105 of 2010. WITH

Civil Appeal No. 4015 of 2018. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda, Purushaindra Kumar, Advs. Gen., Naman Nagrath, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Parag Triathi, Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Advs., Harsh Parashar, Jubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Jasdeep S. Dhillon, Prabhat K. Chaurasia, Ms. Renuka Sahu, Jay Savla, Amar Varun, Shantanu Krishna, Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Dhurav Mishra, Divyanshu Kumar Srivastav, Akash Lamba, Viren Sibal, Vivekananda B., Vikas Sood, Apporv Kurup, Ms. Isha Mital, Dr. Harsh Pathak, Ms. Shweta Mahajan, Mohit Chaubey, Siddharth Shukla, Neeraj Shekhar, Arjun Garg, Mishra Saurabh, Sridhar Potaraju, Sudhir Mishra, Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Petal Chandok, Ms. Ankita Sharma, Rishabh,

MADHYA PRADESH RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. BACKBONE ENTERPRISES LIMITED

M. R. Shamshad, Aditya Samaddar, B. S. Banthia, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Saurabh S. Sinha, Aditya Dev Triguna, Sunil Singh Parihar, M/S. AP & J Chambers, Prafulla Kumar Behera, Manish K. Bhardwaj, S. S. Nehra, Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Varun Mohan, Swastik Singh, Manish Yadav, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, B.N. Dubey, Ms. Devika Gulati, Hitendra Nath Rath, Mayank Kshirsagar, Pavesh Joshi, Chavu Ambwani (For M/S. AP & J Chambers), B. K. Satija, Sumit Attri, K. Krishna Kumar, Hitendra Nath Rath, Nilava Bandyopadhayay, Rahul Pandey, Advs. or the appearing parties.

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.

2. In view of judgment of this Court in Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another, (2011) 13 SCC 261 having been overruled and as the High Court has relied on Judgment in C.R. NO.353 of 2004, Mahesh Chandra Garg v. State of M.P. and Ors. decided on 23.2.2010 which was based on Va Tech (supra), the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal so that the said Tribunal can deal with the matter on merits in accordance with law.

3. The appeals are disposed of.

4. The parties may appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings on 9th July, 2018.

5. The appellant may serve a copy of this order on the respondents.

Kalpana K. Tripathy

Appeals disposed of.

Cited by · 1

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.