Supreme Court of India · [2007] 11 S.C.R. 730

Bhudev Sharma v. District Judge, Bulandshahr And Anr.

Decided
31 October 2007
Neutral citation
2007 INSC 1111
Bench
A.K. MATHUR
Cited by 1 later Supreme Court judgment

BHUDEVS~ V.

DISTRICT Jl.JOGE, BULANOSiiAHR AND ANR. OCTOBER 31, 2007

[A.K. . MATHl.J-Ri\ND 1'1ARKANPEY KATJU, JJ.J. ~A

S@rvic~ Lqw-:-:Reservatiqn-Far Physically handicapped c

"

persons-Selection-For Class III posts-2% posts reserved for physically handicappgd-=Single Physically handiq9.p.v.e,d person applied and appeared in rg~ruitmgnt !~~(,.,.-lp,et;#edappointment-lfeld: The applicant was ~~titled to be appointed ag_fl.~n~{ ~'1f· ~r:s::;·ved po~·t, being the only candidate. · ~9 p9,sfs wer~ ?PV~rti~~d for Class III Posts in Bulandshahr

D Judg@§llip mV:ri: Ap.p~•l~nt (a blind man) appeared in recruitment test, btJt W3S not selected. He filed Writ Petition. Single Judge of High.Court directed his appointment, but the same was set aside by Division Bench of High Court. Hence the present appeal.

Allowing the appeal, the Court

HELD: By G.O. dated 26.08.1993 U.P. Government has reserved 2% posts for physically handicapped persons for direct recruitment in all groups of Government services. The physically handicapped persons are thos~ whg 3f~ blind, deaf and dumb and F otherwise handicapped. There were altogether 30 posts for which the selection was held. 2 per cent of30 is 0.6. Since 0.6 is more than half it is rounded off and held that one out of the 30 posts is reserved for physically handicapped persons. Since there was no other physically handicapped per~1m_ wtio ~pplied, the appellant was G ~ntitled to the post reserv'ed for physically handicapped persons. The ;tppellant is already working on the post in view of the interim order of this Court. Hence he shall be regularized. [Paras 3 and 5) [731-E, F, G; 732-A)

1' j

' "''TT inJ::v SHARMA v. BISTRJCT JUDGE, BULANQ~HAHR

73 l tltlUi..n._,,__

·-

-·'"A'T'TTTJl

[MARKANUt Y l\1-\.1 Ju,,,. 1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 6168 of A 2001. From the final Judgment and Order dated 23,5,2001 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Special Appeal No. 445 of200I. Gaurav Jain and Abha Jain for the Appellant.

Ashok K. Srivastava for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MARKANDEY KATJU, J. 1. This appeal has been filed ag~inst c; the impugned judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 23.05.2001 in Special Appeal No. 445 of 2001. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. The appellant is a blind man. He appeared in the recruitment test held in the year 1992 for selecting candidates for Class-III Posts in D Bulandshahr Judgeship in U.P. However, he was riot selected and hence he filed a writ petition which was allowed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court by his judgment dated 25.09.1997. Against that judgment the State Government filed a letters patent appeal which has been allowed by the impugned judgment by the Division Bench. Hence E this appeal.

3. The appellant has relied on G.O. dated 26.08.1993 which is Annexure P-I to this appeal. That G.O. states that the U.P. Government has reserved 2 per cent posts for physically handicapped persons for direct F recruitment' in all groups of Government services. The physically handicapped persons are those who are blind, deaf and dumb and otherw·ise handicapped. There were altogether 30 posts for which the selection was held. 2 per cent of 30 is 0.6. Since 0.6 is more than half we round it off and hold that one out of the 30 posts is reserved for G physically handicapped persons. Since there was no other physically handicapped person who applied, in our opinion, the appellant was entitled ' to the post reserved for physically handicapped persons.

4. In this v.iew of the matter, the appeal is allowed, the impugned

\

A judgment of the Division Bench is set aside and it is directed that the appellant be appointed on a Class-III Post in Bulandshahr Judgeship forthwith.

5. We are infonned that the appellant is already working on the post in view of the interim order of this Court. J:Ience he shall be regularized B and allowed to continue working as a regular Class-III employee and shall be given all the consequential bene~~·

K.K.T.

"'

)..,_

Appeal allowed.

':

'

I J

;; p

)l

,,,

I

Cited by · 1

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.