Supreme Court of India · [2009] 8 S.C.R. 562

M/s. Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise, Allahabad

Decided
8 May 2009
Neutral citation
2009 INSC 776
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Outcome
Dismissed
Cited by 1 later Supreme Court judgment

Headnote

The reporters’ summary of the points decided. It is not part of the judgment.

M/S. CHAUDHARANA STEELS (P) LTD. V.

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, ALLAHABAD (Civii Appeal No. 5389 of 2007)

MAY 8, 2009 [DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.]

Cenfral Excise Act, 1944 - s. 35-G - Condonation of delay in filing appeal under - Power of - Held: High Court has no power to condone the delay.

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise, Naida v. D Punjab Fibres Ltd., Noida 2008 (3) SCC 73; Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise v. Mis. Hoga India (P) Ltd. and Anr. 2009 (4) SCALE 37 4, relied on.

Case Law Reference

2008 (3) sec 13

Relied on.

Para 1

2009 (4) SCALE 374

Relied on.

Para 1

Judgment

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 5389 of 2007.

'

From the Judgment & Order dated 27.07.2007 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Central Excise Appeal No. 23 (D) of 2005.

Pankaj Bhatia, Vivek Choudhary and Jainendra G Maldahiyar (T. Mahipal) for the Appellants. Navin Prakash (8.V. Balaram Das) for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

CHAUDHARANA STEELS (P) LTD. v. COMMNR. OF 563 CENTRAL EXCISE, ALLAHABAD

-

DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. In this appeal the only ~ question that arises for consideration is whether there is power for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short the 'Act'). By judgment delivered in Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise, Noicja v. Punjab Fibres Ltd., Naida (2008 (3) SCC 73) it was helq that the High Court has no power to condone delay in seeking reference under Section 35-H of the Act. Doubting correctness of the view reference was made to larger Bench. By judgment dated 27.3.2009 a three-judge Bench in

Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise ~: Mis. Hongo India (P) Ltd. & Anr. 2009 (4) SCALE 374 concurred with the view t~ken by the two-judge Bench in Punjab Fibres case c

(supra). The decision has full application to the present case also.

•

2. That being so this appeal deserves to be dismissed ·· · which we direct. No costs.

N.J

Appeal dismissed.

Cited by · 1

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.