Supreme Court of India · [2009] 7 S.C.R. 84

RAJA RAM Kashyap & Ors. v. State Of U.p. & Anr.

Decided
24 April 2009
Neutral citation
2009 INSC 603
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Outcome
Disposed off

RAJA RAM KASHYAP & ORS.

v.

STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2009 APRIL 24, 2009

[DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s. 320 (2) Compounding of offence punishable under Penal Code C Permissibility of - Settlement of disputes between parties and parties intending to compound offence u!ss. 406 and 420 /PC - Held: Under s. 320(2) offence specified could be compounded by victim with the permission of the court before which prosecution for such offence is pending - Parties given D liberty to file application u/s 320 and the concerned court would deal with the matter. CRIMINALAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2009

From the Judgement and Order dated 18.03.2008 of the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 4714 of 2008. Dinesh Kumar Garg, for the Appellant.

Ratnakar Dash, S. Akbar Abbas, Abdi, Anuvrat Sharma, R.C. Kaushik, with him for the Respondent. The Judgement of the Court was delivered by

DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

Leave granted. The only question raised is that since the parties have settled their dispute and want to compound the offence i.e Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short

RAJA RAM KASHYAP & ORS. V. STATE OF U.P. & ANR [DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.)

..

the 'Act'), the court should have permit it to be in terms of sub- A section (2) of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Code'). The offences indicated in the table are compoundable and it is indicated as to who is the person by whom the offence may be compounded. Sub-section 320 of the Code so far as relevant reads as B follows:

j.

The offence punishable under the sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) specified with the permission of the Court before which any prosecution for such offence is pending, be compounded by the persons mentioned. Offence

Section

Person by whom offencee may be comgounded

Criminal breach of trust, where the value of the property does not exceed {Two hundred rupees)

The person to whom hurt is caused

Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security

The owner of the property.

... J

"

':'

If the parties file necessary application for compounding in terms of the Section 320 of the Code, the concerned court will deal with the matter appropriately. The interim order passed by this court shall continue for a period of three months so that necessary steps can be taken. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. .f

N.J.

Appeal disposed of.

c

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.