Supreme Court of India · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 781

Union Of India & Ors. v. Chatro DEVI & Ors.

Decided
7 May 2014
Bench
B.S. CHAUHAN, JASTI CHELAMESWAR, M.Y. EQBAL
Outcome
Dismissed
Cited by 2 later Supreme Court judgments

[2014] 8 S.C.R. 781 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

v. CHATRO DEVI & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 1831-1836 of 2009) MAY 07, 2014

[DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. CHELAMESWAR AND M.Y. EQBAL, JJ.]

Land Acquisition Act, 1894: s.5-A - Objections filed by tenure-holders uls. 5-A - Subsequent proceedings quashed - Held: In view of C.A. No. 5478-8312014, State's appeal is dismissed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 1831-1836 of 2009. From the Judgment and Order dated 11.05i.2007 of the High Court of Delhi in W.P. (C) Nos. 424 of 19817, 2746 of 1985, 2815 of 1985, 607 of 1987, 2469 of 1985 aAd 1950 of 1985.

·E

WITH C.A. Nos. 903 of 2010, 7439 of 2009, 8483 of 2003, 548488, 5489-94, 5495-98, 5499-501 of 2014. P. P. Malhotra, ASG, J. S. Attri, Geeta Luthra, Sanjay Poddar, Vinay Bhasin, Mukul Rohatgi, Gopal Jain, Shyam Divan, A. Sharan, Sandeep Bajaj, Siddharth Panda, D. S. Mahra, Anshuman Nayak, Shadman Ali, Gaurav Sharma, Chetan Chawla, Govind Kumar, Sonia Malhotra, Priyanka Bharihoke, Yasir Rauf, Pradeep Misra, Daleep Kr. Dhayani, D. N. Goburdhan, Narendra Goyal, Naina Dubey, Rohit Bhardwaj, Anil Katiyar, H. S. Raina, Bhargava V. Desai, Shreyas Mehrotra, R. N. Karanjawala, Manik Karanjawala, Ruby Singh Ahuja, Krishna Hariani, Rohit Sharma, Aakanksha Munjhal,

[2014) 8 S.C.R

Karanjawala & Co.. , S. S. Khanduja, Archana Sharma, Meenakshi Kalra, Shobha, Yash Pal Dhingra, Indra Sawhney, Simran Mehta, Arvind Minocha, Veena· Minocha, Sumit Bansal, Ateev Mathur, Richa Oberoi, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Pankaj Gupta, Anusuya Salwan, S. Janani, Kunal Kohli, G. Umapathy, B Rakesh K. Sharma, Venkatasubramanian, S. Ramasubramanian, R. Mekhala, P. V. Yogeswaran, Manish Kumar, Amit Kumar, Piyush Kaushik, Rakesh K. Sharma, N. S. Vasisht, Pradeep Misra, Daleep Kr. Dhayani, Sumit Bansal, Gagan Gupta, Ateev P. Mathur, Vishnu B. Saharya (for Saharya & Co.), Advocates, with them for the appearing parties.

c

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

ORDER

1. The facts and issue involved/ in the abovesaid appeals are identical and have to be decided in terms of our judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos. 5478-5483 of 2014.

2. The appeals are dismissed in terms thereof. No order as to costs.

Devika Gujral

Appeals dismissed.

Cited by · 2

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.