Supreme Court of India · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 919

Rohith Thammana Gowda v. Rajini Nalini Ramesh

Decided
14 September 2022
Neutral citation
2022 INSC 1321
Bench
BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR
Outcome
Directions issued
Cited by 2 later Supreme Court judgments

ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDA v. RAJINI NALINI RAMESH (Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 461/2022 in C.A. No. 4987/2022) SEPTEMBER 14, 2022

[B. R. GAVAI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Judgment/Order – Additional direction – Held: Directions were issued in Paragraph 18 of the judgment dated 29.07.2022 – In addition to that, petitioner-husband directed to not take any coercive steps against the respondent-wife in any of the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, USA – Further, both the parties directed to file a joint application before the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, USA for mirroring the judgment dated 29.07.2022. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Conmt.Pet.(C) No. 461 of 2022 in C.A. No. 4987 of 2022. Petition filed for willful disobedience of the judgment dated 29.07.2022 in Civil Appeal No. 4987 of 2022 passed by the Supreme Court of India.

With M.A. No. 1368 of 2022 in C.A. No. 4987/2022, M.A. No. 1369 of 2022 in C.A. No. 4987 of 2022. R. Basant, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv., Siddhant Buxy, Manu Krishnan, Krishna Sumanth, Vivek Jain, Ms. Suchitra Kambhat, Abhinav Jain, Prabhajit Johar, Panveer Talwar, S. S. Jauhar, Advs. for the appearing parties

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER

In addition to the directions issued in paragraph 18(i) to (iv) of the judgment dated 29.07.2022, the following direction shall be read as direction No. 18 (v) of the said judgment: “The petitioner-husband shall not take any coercive steps against the respondent-wife in any of the proceedings pending in the

Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America.” The parties shall file a joint application before the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America duly signed by their respective counsel for mirroring the judgment dated 29.07.2022.

List this matter after 10 days to enable the parties place on record the mirror order. Ankit Gyan (Assisted by : Aarsh Choudhary, LCRA)

Directions issued.

Cited by · 2

Later Supreme Court judgments in our index that cite this one by name, newest first.

Found by matching case names, so a citation written very differently can be missed, and High Court judgments are not included. Read the citing judgment to see whether it followed or distinguished this one.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.