Supreme Court of India · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 819

RE: Vijay Kurle & Ors. v. .

Decided
21 March 2022
Neutral citation
2022 INSC 1298
Bench
DINESH MAHESHWARI, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Outcome
Case Allowed

RE: VIJAY KURLE & ORS.

(Miscellaneous Application No. 486 of 2022) In (Suo Motu Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019)

MARCH 21, 2022 Judgment/Order – Correction of typographical error – In paragraph no.7, ‘92) of Article 142’ to be read as ‘(2) of Article 142’ – Miscellaneous application allowed. INHERENT JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application No. 486 of 2022 In Suo Moto Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019.

From the Judgment and Order dated 04.05.2020 in SMC (Crl) No.2 of 2019 of this Court. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Nitin Saluja, Nilesh C. Ojha, Prem Sunder Jha, Ishwarlal S. Agarwal, Ms. Dipali N. Ojha, Pratik Jain Saklecha, Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Siddhi A. Dhamnaskar, Ms. Snehal S. Surve, Ms. Poonam P. Rajbhar, Ms. Deepika G. Jaiswal, Mangesh B. Dongre, Sohan R. Agate, Pritam Bishwas, Anant Misra Advs. for the appearing parties.

The following Order of the Court was passed:

ORDER In terms of the office report, the suggested corrigendum, as stated infra, be carried out in the judgment delivered on 27-04-2020:-

M.A. No. 486 of 2022 stands allowed. Ankit Gyan

Petition allowed.

Text of the official Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.) edition, extracted from the court’s PDF. Page headers and margin letters have been removed; a stray one may remain inside a paragraph. For citing, rely on the official PDF.

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0), from eCourts.